Comments on: Mage Knight Review https://thethoughtfulgamer.com/2017/07/23/mage-knight-review/ Board Game Reviews, Analysis, and Strategy Mon, 27 May 2024 14:47:26 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.1 By: Sharon Culpepper https://thethoughtfulgamer.com/2017/07/23/mage-knight-review/#comment-1072 Mon, 27 May 2024 14:47:26 +0000 http://thethoughtfulgamer.com/?p=755#comment-1072 hello people

]]> By: Marc Davis https://thethoughtfulgamer.com/2017/07/23/mage-knight-review/#comment-138 Fri, 04 Aug 2017 22:59:40 +0000 http://thethoughtfulgamer.com/?p=755#comment-138 In reply to theanomaloushost.

It’s a 5/5 on my scale (“commitment required”), though I definitely understand it’s not nearly as complicated as many games. Consider this on the low end of a 5/5 rating.

And I’ve definitely looked into Magic Realms before. I’d love to get my hands on a copy someday.

]]> By: theanomaloushost https://thethoughtfulgamer.com/2017/07/23/mage-knight-review/#comment-137 Fri, 04 Aug 2017 22:55:53 +0000 http://thethoughtfulgamer.com/?p=755#comment-137 You think this is a 5/5 for complexity and learning curves? Dude, you haven’t witnessed the godfather of (fantasy) board gaming if you think that. Try taking a look into Magic Realm from 1979. Much more sandbox-like compared to this, but also more complex. Just to give you an idea, the 3rd edition rulebook is over 120 pages in length. Mage Knight would probably be my favorite solo-playable fantasy game if not for that one.

]]>